Triple
T10181602
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LEGO Mindstorms RCX |
E236797
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOutputPorts |
P34282
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 3 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 3 | Statement: [LEGO Mindstorms RCX, hasOutputPorts, 3]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOutputPorts Context triple: [LEGO Mindstorms RCX, hasOutputPorts, 3]
-
A.
hasPorts
chosen
Indicates that an entity is equipped with or provides access points (ports) for connection, communication, or interface with other entities or systems.
-
B.
hasOutputType
Indicates that an entity produces, returns, or yields a result of a specified type.
-
C.
hasPortConnection
Indicates that one entity is linked to another via a port or interface through which data, power, or signals can be transmitted.
-
D.
outputsTo
Indicates that the result or data produced by one entity is directed or sent to another entity as its destination or target.
-
E.
hasPortOn
Indicates that one entity possesses or is located adjacent to a port situated on another specified geographic or infrastructural feature (such as a coast, river, or lake).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84d7260c8190bfbec36762943f37 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cded32b91c8190b01ad37b2456080a |
completed | April 2, 2026, 4:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd7c79f21c8190a7f31b2eab80b8ba |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:12 p.m.