Triple
T10179653
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CC0 |
E235951
|
entity |
| Predicate | rightsGranted |
P66994
|
FINISHED |
| Object | copy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: copy | Statement: [CC0, rightsGranted, copy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rightsGranted Context triple: [CC0, rightsGranted, copy]
-
A.
authorityGranted
Indicates that one entity has formally given another entity the power, rights, or permission to act or make decisions, typically within a defined scope or context.
-
B.
rightsInclude
Indicates that one set of rights encompasses, contains, or subsumes another set of rights.
-
C.
rights
Indicates that an entity possesses entitlements, permissions, or legal/moral claims in relation to another entity or context.
-
D.
grantedRightsType
chosen
Indicates the specific category or nature of rights that have been granted in a given permission or authorization relationship.
-
E.
rightsConcept
Indicates that there is a conceptual or definitional relationship involving rights, such as the idea, principle, or framework underlying specific rights.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84d1d5f88190ab878a1021ecff68 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdecd7ed608190bfdec8b61cc99205 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 4:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd7c79f21c8190a7f31b2eab80b8ba |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:11 p.m.