Triple
T10178331
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Simpson, Hall, Miller & Co. |
E235912
|
entity |
| Predicate | designActivity |
P64516
|
FINISHED |
| Object | silverware design |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: silverware design | Statement: [Simpson, Hall, Miller & Co., designActivity, silverware design]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designActivity Context triple: [Simpson, Hall, Miller & Co., designActivity, silverware design]
-
A.
designLead
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary designer or person in charge of leading the design work for another entity or project.
-
B.
designUse
Indicates that one entity is used as a design basis, purpose, or intended functional use for another entity.
-
C.
designChallenge
Indicates a situation in which an entity is tasked with creating, improving, or solving something through a structured design problem or assignment.
-
D.
designSelected
Indicates that a particular design option has been chosen or marked as the active/primary selection among alternatives.
-
E.
designGeneration
chosen
Indicates that one entity is responsible for creating or producing the design of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84d1d5f88190ab878a1021ecff68 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdecd620808190892c6e3074500280 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 4:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd7c79f21c8190a7f31b2eab80b8ba |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:11 p.m.