Triple

T10172480
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Freeman Lake Park E235363 entity
Predicate hasBodyOfWaterType P92225 FINISHED
Object reservoir LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reservoir | Statement: [Freeman Lake Park, hasBodyOfWaterType, reservoir]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBodyOfWaterType
Context triple: [Freeman Lake Park, hasBodyOfWaterType, reservoir]
  • A. locatedInBodyOfWater
    Indicates that an entity is situated within or on the surface of a specific body of water.
  • B. hasAssociatedWaterBody
    Indicates that one entity is linked to, or occurs in connection with, a specific body of water such as a river, lake, or sea.
  • C. hasAreaWaterBody
    Indicates that an entity includes, contains, or is associated with a body of water within its area or boundaries.
  • D. connectedBodyOfWater
    Indicates that two geographic locations are linked by a continuous body of water through which water can flow between them.
  • E. isInlandWaterBodyOf
    Indicates that one water body is an inland (non-oceanic) water feature that is geographically part of, contained within, or associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84ceafd0819085828600e11bed6b completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdec9f6dd8819081588600499165ee completed April 2, 2026, 4:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4ba9956c8190a3e15d091e33149d completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd4fed19d481909d2c7ff1114664b6 completed April 1, 2026, 5:03 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:10 p.m.