Triple

T10170607
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Prosecutor v. Théoneste Bagosora E235320 entity
Predicate sentenceOnAppeal P20881 FINISHED
Object 35 years imprisonment LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 35 years imprisonment | Statement: [Prosecutor v. Théoneste Bagosora, sentenceOnAppeal, 35 years imprisonment]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sentenceOnAppeal
Context triple: [Prosecutor v. Théoneste Bagosora, sentenceOnAppeal, 35 years imprisonment]
  • A. appeal
    Indicates that one party formally requests a higher authority to review, reconsider, or overturn a prior decision, judgment, or outcome.
  • B. sentencedOn
    Indicates that a judicial authority has formally imposed a legal sentence or punishment on an entity on a specific date.
  • C. sentenceOf
    Indicates that one entity is a sentence that belongs to, is contained in, or is part of another larger text or document.
  • D. sentence
    Indicates that one entity is a sentence that expresses, contains, or encodes information about another entity.
  • E. sentencedTo chosen
    Indicates that an authority has officially assigned a specific punishment or penalty to an entity, typically as the outcome of a legal or disciplinary process.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84ceafd0819085828600e11bed6b completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdec9d36608190be78665cc3410cf2 completed April 2, 2026, 4:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4ba9956c8190a3e15d091e33149d completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:10 p.m.