Triple

T10168365
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Noise_XX pattern E235263 entity
Predicate thirdMessageDirection P82565 FINISHED
Object initiator-to-responder LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: initiator-to-responder | Statement: [Noise_XX pattern, thirdMessageDirection, initiator-to-responder]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: thirdMessageDirection
Context triple: [Noise_XX pattern, thirdMessageDirection, initiator-to-responder]
  • A. communicationDirection chosen
    Indicates the directional flow of a communication act, specifying who is sending information and who is receiving it.
  • B. thirdWord
    Indicates that one entity is the third word in sequence within another entity (such as a text or phrase).
  • C. thirdMovementType
    Indicates the specific type or category of the third movement within a larger sequence or structure of movements.
  • D. thirdElement
    Indicates that one entity is the third element in an ordered sequence or tuple associated with another entity.
  • E. thirdSingle
    Indicates that an entity is the third single (e.g., third single release) associated with another entity, typically in a sequence such as from an album or artist.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84ceafd0819085828600e11bed6b completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdec6f64a48190883aefce58a65ca6 completed April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4ba9956c8190a3e15d091e33149d completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:10 p.m.