Triple

T10168324
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Noise_XK pattern E235262 entity
Predicate letterKMeaning P47684 FINISHED
Object responder static key known to initiator LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: responder static key known to initiator | Statement: [Noise_XK pattern, letterKMeaning, responder static key known to initiator]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: letterKMeaning
Context triple: [Noise_XK pattern, letterKMeaning, responder static key known to initiator]
  • A. letterMeaning chosen
    Indicates that a particular letter conveys a specific meaning, interpretation, or semantic content.
  • B. lettersMeaning
    Indicates that a set of letters or characters represents, signifies, or conveys a particular meaning or message.
  • C. chantMeaning
    Indicates that an entity performs or conveys the meaning or content of a chant in relation to another entity or context.
  • D. stringMeaning
    Indicates that one entity represents the semantic content or interpretation of a given string associated with another entity.
  • E. logicalMeaning
    Indicates that one entity expresses, encodes, or conveys the logical content, implication, or formal meaning of another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84ceafd0819085828600e11bed6b completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdec6f64a48190883aefce58a65ca6 completed April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4ba9956c8190a3e15d091e33149d completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:10 p.m.