Triple

T10168237
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Noise_NK pattern E235260 entity
Predicate secondMessageSender P92199 FINISHED
Object responder LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: responder | Statement: [Noise_NK pattern, secondMessageSender, responder]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: secondMessageSender
Context triple: [Noise_NK pattern, secondMessageSender, responder]
  • A. secondCreatedBy
    Indicates that an entity was created by a second or subsequent creator, distinguishing this creator from the primary or original one.
  • B. secondHolder
    Indicates that an entity is the second person or party to hold or possess a particular item, role, title, or position in a sequence.
  • C. secondedBy
    Indicates that an initial proposal, motion, or action by one entity is formally supported or endorsed by another entity as a second.
  • D. secondPhase
    Indicates that an entity is in, or has progressed to, the second phase or stage of a multi-phase process or sequence.
  • E. secondOnlyTo
    Indicates that one entity ranks immediately below another in degree, importance, or quality, with only that other entity surpassing it.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84ceafd0819085828600e11bed6b completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdec6f64a48190883aefce58a65ca6 completed April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4ba9956c8190a3e15d091e33149d completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd4fed19d481909d2c7ff1114664b6 completed April 1, 2026, 5:03 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:10 p.m.