Triple
T10168224
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Noise_NK pattern |
E235260
|
entity |
| Predicate | assumesResponderStaticKey |
P92198
|
FINISHED |
| Object | present |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: present | Statement: [Noise_NK pattern, assumesResponderStaticKey, present]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: assumesResponderStaticKey Context triple: [Noise_NK pattern, assumesResponderStaticKey, present]
-
A.
respondsTo
Indicates that one entity replies or reacts to a message, action, or stimulus originating from another entity.
-
B.
respondentStatus
Indicates the current role, condition, or state of a respondent in relation to a survey, inquiry, or legal/administrative process.
-
C.
canBeInvokedBy
Indicates that one entity (such as a function, method, or operation) is able to be called, triggered, or executed by another entity.
-
D.
isResonantObject
Indicates that one entity functions as an object capable of resonating (physically or metaphorically) in response to another entity or influence.
-
E.
intendedReceiver
Indicates that one entity is the target or designated recipient of something (such as a message, item, or action) originating from another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84ceafd0819085828600e11bed6b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdec6f64a48190883aefce58a65ca6 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd4ba9956c8190a3e15d091e33149d |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cd4fed19d481909d2c7ff1114664b6 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:03 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:10 p.m.