Triple
T10167644
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SSH_MSG_GLOBAL_REQUEST |
E235246
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayBeIgnoredIf |
P75771
|
FINISHED |
| Object | want_reply is FALSE |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: want_reply is FALSE | Statement: [SSH_MSG_GLOBAL_REQUEST, mayBeIgnoredIf, want_reply is FALSE]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayBeIgnoredIf Context triple: [SSH_MSG_GLOBAL_REQUEST, mayBeIgnoredIf, want_reply is FALSE]
-
A.
mayBeIgnoredByClients
Indicates that the associated element is optional and can be safely disregarded or not processed by clients without affecting core functionality.
-
B.
mayBeOmittedWhen
chosen
Indicates that one element is allowed to be left out or excluded under certain conditions defined by another element or context.
-
C.
ignoredBy
Indicates that one entity does not pay attention or respond to another entity.
-
D.
doesNotApplyIf
Indicates that a rule, condition, or effect is not valid or should not be enforced when a specified circumstance or exception is present.
-
E.
mayBeEqualTo
Indicates that two entities are possibly equal, but their equality is uncertain or not definitively established.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84ceafd0819085828600e11bed6b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdec6e016c81909ded2a16b839c405 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd4ba9956c8190a3e15d091e33149d |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:10 p.m.