Triple
T10167623
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SSH_MSG_GLOBAL_REQUEST |
E235246
|
entity |
| Predicate | definedIn |
P775
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 4254 |
E46675
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 4254 | Statement: [SSH_MSG_GLOBAL_REQUEST, definedIn, RFC 4254]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 4254 Context triple: [SSH_MSG_GLOBAL_REQUEST, definedIn, RFC 4254]
-
A.
RFC 4254
chosen
RFC 4254 is the Internet standard that specifies the Secure Shell (SSH) connection protocol, defining how multiple logical channels are multiplexed over a single encrypted SSH transport.
-
B.
RFC 4250
RFC 4250 is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) document that defines and registers protocol parameters and message numbers used by the Secure Shell (SSH) protocol suite.
-
C.
RFC 4954
RFC 4954 is an Internet standard that specifies the SMTP Authentication (SMTP AUTH) extension, enabling secure client authentication when sending email.
-
D.
RFC 2440
RFC 2440 is the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) specification that defines the OpenPGP message format for encrypted and signed data.
-
E.
RFC 4844
RFC 4844 is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) document that defines the framework and responsibilities of the RFC Editor function within the RFC Series.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84ceafd0819085828600e11bed6b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdec6e016c81909ded2a16b839c405 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d300ebacb88190850cf2242309b6ba |
completed | April 6, 2026, 12:40 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:10 p.m.