Triple

T10162206
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Piers Courage E233916 entity
Predicate bestF1Result P92356 FINISHED
Object 2nd place LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2nd place | Statement: [Piers Courage, bestF1Result, 2nd place]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: bestF1Result
Context triple: [Piers Courage, bestF1Result, 2nd place]
  • A. bestForward
    Indicates that the subject is considered the most effective or outstanding forward (e.g., in an offensive or attacking role) relative to a given group or context.
  • B. bestResultFIFA U-20 World Cup
    Indicates the highest placement or achievement an entity has attained in any edition of the FIFA U-20 World Cup.
  • C. bestResultFifaU17WWC
    Indicates that the object is the best performance or highest achievement an entity has attained in the FIFA U-17 Women's World Cup.
  • D. finalScore
    Indicates the resulting or overall score achieved after all contributing actions, events, or evaluations are completed.
  • E. bestObservedWith
    Indicates that one entity is most effectively or appropriately observed, detected, or measured when used or considered together with another specified entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca848e80748190b91d1e04d35512c7 completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdec5b5194819095645e9174897b0f completed April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4ba795808190acc9124c98c6e40f completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd4f8f869c8190a82ad040993e0244 completed April 1, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:09 p.m.