Triple
T10160747
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Christianismi Restitutio |
E233882
|
entity |
| Predicate | doctrineChallenged |
P92351
|
FINISHED |
| Object | orthodox Trinitarian doctrine |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: orthodox Trinitarian doctrine | Statement: [Christianismi Restitutio, doctrineChallenged, orthodox Trinitarian doctrine]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: doctrineChallenged Context triple: [Christianismi Restitutio, doctrineChallenged, orthodox Trinitarian doctrine]
-
A.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
B.
doctrineHeld
Indicates that an agent adheres to, supports, or maintains a particular doctrine or set of principles.
-
C.
stateChallenged
Indicates that a state or condition is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another party.
-
D.
constitutionalChallenge
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
-
E.
challengedStatute
Indicates that a particular statute or law is being contested, questioned, or disputed, typically in a legal or constitutional proceeding.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca848e80748190b91d1e04d35512c7 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdec5831e481909b48fdfa8f1c670b |
completed | April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd4ba795808190acc9124c98c6e40f |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cd4f8f869c8190a82ad040993e0244 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:09 p.m.