Triple
T10159841
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Great Britain B roads |
E233859
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalCarriagewayType |
P22311
|
FINISHED |
| Object | single carriageway |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: single carriageway | Statement: [Great Britain B roads, typicalCarriagewayType, single carriageway]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalCarriagewayType Context triple: [Great Britain B roads, typicalCarriagewayType, single carriageway]
-
A.
isCarriagewayOf
Indicates that a given road segment functions as a carriageway that forms part of, or belongs to, a larger road or route.
-
B.
hasCarriagewayType
chosen
Indicates the specific structural or functional type of carriageway associated with a road segment (e.g., single, dual, or other carriageway configurations).
-
C.
roadType
Indicates the classification or category of a road based on its functional or physical characteristics.
-
D.
causewayType
Indicates the specific kind or classification of a causeway associated with an entity.
-
E.
roadwayCarries
Indicates that a roadway serves as a route that supports or conveys a particular transportation facility, traffic flow, or designated use.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca848e80748190b91d1e04d35512c7 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdec5831e481909b48fdfa8f1c670b |
completed | April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd4ba795808190acc9124c98c6e40f |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:09 p.m.