Triple

T10159836
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Great Britain B roads E233859 entity
Predicate hasRoadNumberFormat P21547 FINISHED
Object B + numeric identifier LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: B + numeric identifier | Statement: [Great Britain B roads, hasRoadNumberFormat, B + numeric identifier]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRoadNumberFormat
Context triple: [Great Britain B roads, hasRoadNumberFormat, B + numeric identifier]
  • A. hasRoadNumberStatus
    Indicates that a road or route is associated with a specific status regarding its assigned road number (e.g., active, reserved, retired, or provisional).
  • B. hasConnectingRoadNumber
    Indicates that there exists a road connection between two locations or road segments identified by a specific road number.
  • C. routeNumberFormat chosen
    Indicates how the identifying number or code for a route is structured or formatted.
  • D. hasRoadSuffix
    Indicates that a road or street name ends with a specific suffix (such as "Street", "Avenue", or "Boulevard").
  • E. hasJunctionNumbering
    Indicates that a road or route is assigned a specific numbering system for its junctions or intersections.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca848e80748190b91d1e04d35512c7 completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdec5831e481909b48fdfa8f1c670b completed April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4ba795808190acc9124c98c6e40f completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:09 p.m.