Triple
T10158906
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 1459 |
E233837
|
entity |
| Predicate | obsoletedBy |
P101
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 2812 |
E237068
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 2812 | Statement: [RFC 1459, obsoletedBy, RFC 2812]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 2812 Context triple: [RFC 1459, obsoletedBy, RFC 2812]
-
A.
RFC 2812
chosen
RFC 2812 is an Internet standards document that specifies the client protocol for the Internet Relay Chat (IRC) network.
-
B.
RFC 1459
RFC 1459 is the original specification that defines the core protocol, architecture, and message formats for the Internet Relay Chat (IRC) system.
-
C.
RFC 2811
RFC 2811 is an Internet standards document that specifies the architecture and operation of Internet Relay Chat (IRC) channel management.
-
D.
RFC 854
RFC 854 is the foundational Internet standard that specifies the Telnet protocol for remote, text-based communication over TCP/IP networks.
-
E.
RFC 1457
RFC 1457 is an early Internet standards document that specified guidelines and mechanisms related to network management within the SNMP framework before being superseded by later updates.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca848e80748190b91d1e04d35512c7 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdec56d944819081bc6ea36c905ba2 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d300b7b3108190a8e7581193c322be |
completed | April 6, 2026, 12:39 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:09 p.m.