Triple

T10158207
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 4510 E233823 entity
Predicate obsoletes P101 FINISHED
Object RFC 2255 E826112 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 2255 | Statement: [RFC 4510, obsoletes, RFC 2255]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 2255
Context triple: [RFC 4510, obsoletes, RFC 2255]
  • A. RFC 2595
    RFC 2595 is an Internet standard that originally defined the use of TLS to secure email-related protocols such as IMAP, POP3, and ACAP.
  • B. RFC 2575
    RFC 2575 is an earlier IETF standard that defined the View-based Access Control Model (VACM) for SNMP before being superseded by RFC 3415.
  • C. RFC 2572
    RFC 2572 is an earlier IETF specification that defined the Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) before being superseded by RFC 3412.
  • D. RFC 2256 chosen
    RFC 2256 is an earlier LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) schema specification that was later superseded by RFC 4517.
  • E. RFC 1655
    RFC 1655 is an early Internet standards document that specified the original Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) version 2 framework before being superseded by later revisions.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca848e80748190b91d1e04d35512c7 completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdec5507f08190b47f797bacd5640c completed April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d300acae608190891d8f55c3d5102b completed April 6, 2026, 12:39 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:09 p.m.