Triple
T10157788
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 959 |
E233815
|
entity |
| Predicate | definesControlConnectionPort |
P2548
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 21 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 21 | Statement: [RFC 959, definesControlConnectionPort, 21]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definesControlConnectionPort Context triple: [RFC 959, definesControlConnectionPort, 21]
-
A.
controlledPort
Indicates that one entity has authority over or manages the operation or configuration of a specific port of another entity.
-
B.
connectionPort
Indicates a specific port through which two components, systems, or devices are connected or can communicate.
-
C.
hasPortConnection
Indicates that one entity is linked to another via a port or interface through which data, power, or signals can be transmitted.
-
D.
controllerPortCount
Indicates the number of ports available on a given controller.
-
E.
portNumber
chosen
Indicates the specific communication port assigned to a network connection, service, or endpoint.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca848e80748190b91d1e04d35512c7 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdec5507f08190b47f797bacd5640c |
completed | April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd4ba795808190acc9124c98c6e40f |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:09 p.m.