Triple

T10157759
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject AES-CCM E233814 entity
Predicate requiresKeyAndNonceUniqueness P92331 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [AES-CCM, requiresKeyAndNonceUniqueness, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requiresKeyAndNonceUniqueness
Context triple: [AES-CCM, requiresKeyAndNonceUniqueness, true]
  • A. requiresNonceUniqueness
    Indicates that the action or process demands each nonce value be unique, preventing reuse across operations or transactions.
  • B. usesNonce
    Indicates that one entity employs a nonce (a unique, typically one-time-use value) as part of its interaction or operation with another entity.
  • C. isDeterministicWithFixedNonceAndKey
    Indicates that the outcome of an operation is fully determined and repeatable when the same nonce and key are used, with no additional randomness involved.
  • D. variantNonceSize
    Indicates that there is a specific or differing size of nonce associated with a given variant in a cryptographic or protocol context.
  • E. keyReuse
    Indicates that the same key is used multiple times, rather than being uniquely generated or dedicated for a single use or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca848e80748190b91d1e04d35512c7 completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdec5507f08190b47f797bacd5640c completed April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4ba795808190acc9124c98c6e40f completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd4f8f869c8190a82ad040993e0244 completed April 1, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:09 p.m.