Triple

T10147382
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Leland Tower E231737 entity
Predicate hasLocalLandmarkStatus P13974 FINISHED
Object prominent local landmark in Aurora LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: prominent local landmark in Aurora | Statement: [Leland Tower, hasLocalLandmarkStatus, prominent local landmark in Aurora]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLocalLandmarkStatus
Context triple: [Leland Tower, hasLocalLandmarkStatus, prominent local landmark in Aurora]
  • A. isLocalLandmark chosen
    Indicates that something is recognized as a notable or significant landmark within a specific local area or community.
  • B. isLandmarkFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as a notable or significant reference point or attraction for another entity, such as a place, route, or area.
  • C. hasLandmarkUnderManagement
    Indicates that an entity is responsible for managing or overseeing a particular landmark.
  • D. isLandmarkResultIn
    Indicates that something serves as a landmark within, or as a result associated with, a particular context, area, or entity.
  • E. hasLandmarkArea
    Indicates that a specified area is designated as the landmark area associated with a particular entity or location.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca848364f881908a24366a6feec1db completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdec011c24819089b456fc8b9ed80c completed April 2, 2026, 4:09 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4ba4f5d88190ba68e63be10b08c7 completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:07 p.m.