Triple

T10138716
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dyskolos E226924 entity
Predicate hasModernPerformances P92481 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Dyskolos, hasModernPerformances, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasModernPerformances
Context triple: [Dyskolos, hasModernPerformances, yes]
  • A. notableModernPerformancePractice
    Indicates that the subject is recognized for a significant contemporary or historically informed way of performing a work, influencing how it is interpreted or executed in modern practice.
  • B. hasModernAdaptations
    Indicates that the subject work has been reinterpreted or recreated in contemporary forms, such as recent films, series, books, or other modern media adaptations.
  • C. hasModernEditions
    Indicates that an original work or text has one or more updated or contemporary published editions.
  • D. hasLivePerformanceWith
    Indicates that two or more entities participate together in the same live performance event.
  • E. hasLivePerformanceStyle
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular style or manner of live performance.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8433ec308190b8b25a6fe359c34c completed March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cde88344a481909ee833451fab6e58 completed April 2, 2026, 3:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4ba4f5d88190ba68e63be10b08c7 completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd51bc440c819086320900701f87c2 completed April 1, 2026, 5:11 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:06 p.m.