Triple
T10135326
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kasbah of Tangier |
E226839
|
entity |
| Predicate | isFortificationType |
P22477
|
FINISHED |
| Object | kasbah |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: kasbah | Statement: [Kasbah of Tangier, isFortificationType, kasbah]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isFortificationType Context triple: [Kasbah of Tangier, isFortificationType, kasbah]
-
A.
isFortifiedWith
Indicates that one entity has been strengthened, enriched, or supplemented by the addition of another entity.
-
B.
isFortifiedCity
Indicates that a city is strengthened with defensive structures or fortifications, such as walls, ramparts, or similar protective works.
-
C.
hasFortifications
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses or is equipped with defensive structures or fortification works associated with it.
-
D.
wasFortifiedBy
Indicates that a place or structure received defensive strengthening or fortification through the actions or resources of a specified agent or entity.
-
E.
hasFortificationNearby
Indicates that one entity is located in proximity to, or within the immediate area of, a fortification structure associated with it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8433ec308190b8b25a6fe359c34c |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cde87e1f908190a53865420f2b8f93 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 3:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd4ba4f5d88190ba68e63be10b08c7 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:06 p.m.