Triple

T101319
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject American English E2045 entity
Predicate hasNotableLexicalItem P4548 FINISHED
Object elevator LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: elevator | Statement: [American English, hasNotableLexicalItem, elevator]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableLexicalItem
Context triple: [American English, hasNotableLexicalItem, elevator]
  • A. hasNotableWord chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a word or term that is considered notable, distinctive, or significant in some context.
  • B. hasNotableSubject
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a subject that is particularly significant, prominent, or noteworthy in relation to it.
  • C. hasNotableFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic, trait, or attribute that is considered significant or noteworthy.
  • D. hasSignificantLanguage
    Indicates that an entity possesses a language that plays an important or primary role in its communication, identity, or functioning.
  • E. hasConnotation
    Indicates that one entity carries an implied or associated meaning, tone, or emotional nuance in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24e0a5b7c81908d52da08c60dabc4 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25760af348190bf402089c240887d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:48 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2563921f8819087f720b1c803579f completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:12 a.m.