Triple

T10109926
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject hsn E218212 entity
Predicate hasDialect P4251 FINISHED
Object Ningxiang Xiang E180955 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ningxiang Xiang | Statement: [hsn, hasDialect, Ningxiang Xiang]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ningxiang Xiang
Context triple: [hsn, hasDialect, Ningxiang Xiang]
  • A. Ningxiang chosen
    Ningxiang is a county-level city in Hunan Province, China, administered by the prefecture-level city of Changsha and known for its rapidly developing economy and rich cultural heritage.
  • B. Xinshao Xiang
    Xinshao Xiang is a regional variety of the Xiang Chinese language spoken primarily in Xinshao County, Hunan Province, China.
  • C. Pingxiang
    Pingxiang is a prefecture-level industrial city in western Jiangxi Province, China, known historically for its coal mining and ceramics production.
  • D. Xiangxiang City
    Xiangxiang City is a county-level city in Hunan Province, China, administered by the prefecture-level city of Xiangtan and known for its historical and cultural heritage.
  • E. Dongkou Xiang
    Dongkou Xiang is a regional variety of the Xiang Chinese language spoken in and around Dongkou County in Hunan Province, China.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83da93fc8190b54e44bc2b34857c completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdd0cdb3c88190a74f75bf865664f3 completed April 2, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d90d54c32c8190b175a30c7c905cd2 completed April 10, 2026, 2:46 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:03 p.m.