Triple

T10095146
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 1977 New York City blackout-related unrest E215845 entity
Predicate hasTypeOfDamage P92407 FINISHED
Object commercial property damage LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: commercial property damage | Statement: [1977 New York City blackout-related unrest, hasTypeOfDamage, commercial property damage]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeOfDamage
Context triple: [1977 New York City blackout-related unrest, hasTypeOfDamage, commercial property damage]
  • A. sufferedDamageTo
    Indicates that one entity has experienced harm, loss, or deterioration affecting another entity or one of its parts.
  • B. hasDam
    Indicates that a watercourse, reservoir, or similar feature is impounded or controlled by a specific dam.
  • C. coversDamageType
    Indicates that one entity provides protection, compensation, or applicability for a specified type of damage.
  • D. hasConflictRelatedDamage
    Indicates that an entity has incurred damage that is directly related to, or caused by, a conflict or conflict-related event.
  • E. damagedIn
    Indicates that an entity has suffered harm, impairment, or destruction as a result of a specified event, process, or condition.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83a4947c8190823a7495dc5d96ed completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdd0784c288190967d143beca32c4b completed April 2, 2026, 2:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4b9b853c8190a2af993ce9b21309 completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd5150ae98819086c4f822114b4e2c completed April 1, 2026, 5:09 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:02 p.m.