Triple

T10094599
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Thomas Van Orden E215831 entity
Predicate partyIn P1790 FINISHED
Object Van Orden v. Perry E38158 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Van Orden v. Perry | Statement: [Thomas Van Orden, partyIn, Van Orden v. Perry]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Van Orden v. Perry
Context triple: [Thomas Van Orden, partyIn, Van Orden v. Perry]
  • A. Van Orden v. Perry chosen
    Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
  • B. City of Boerne v. Flores
    City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
  • C. Bucklew v. Precythe
    Bucklew v. Precythe is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld Missouri’s method of execution against an Eighth Amendment challenge, clarifying the standards for inmates claiming that a particular execution protocol would cause them severe pain.
  • D. Eisenstadt v. Baird
    Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
  • E. Texas v. White
    Texas v. White was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Union to be indestructible and that states could not unilaterally secede from it.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83a4947c8190823a7495dc5d96ed completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdd0784c288190967d143beca32c4b completed April 2, 2026, 2:12 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d2b6b8d604819094db099981219e72 completed April 5, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:01 p.m.