Triple
T10092353
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Constanța County |
E215372
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cernavodă |
E265133
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cernavodă | Statement: [Constanța County, contains, Cernavodă]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cernavodă Context triple: [Constanța County, contains, Cernavodă]
-
A.
Cernavodă
chosen
Cernavodă is a town in southeastern Romania best known for its major Danube–Black Sea Canal port and the nearby Cernavodă Nuclear Power Plant.
-
B.
Săpânța
Săpânța is a village in northern Romania renowned for its colorful and humorous "Merry Cemetery," a unique open-air museum of painted wooden crosses and epitaphs.
-
C.
Reșița
Reșița is an industrial city in western Romania, historically known as a major center of steel production and engineering in the Banat region.
-
D.
Oltenița
Oltenița is a town in southern Romania on the banks of the Danube River, historically noted as the site of the Battle of Oltenitza during the Crimean War.
-
E.
Ungheni
Ungheni is a town situated on the Prut River in western Moldova, known as an important border crossing and transport hub between Moldova and Romania.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83a1eed081908b2e9580f2ebeea7 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdd05c3c0c8190927580717429a4e5 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 2:11 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d2e583ec2c819086429bd6d323d780 |
completed | April 5, 2026, 10:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:01 p.m.