Triple

T10085230
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Toulouse–Hendaye E215201 entity
Predicate connectsInlandCityToCoast P91982 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Toulouse–Hendaye, connectsInlandCityToCoast, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: connectsInlandCityToCoast
Context triple: [Toulouse–Hendaye, connectsInlandCityToCoast, true]
  • A. connectsCoastalCity
    Indicates a relationship where one entity provides a direct connection or link (such as transport or infrastructure) between coastal cities.
  • B. connectsPeninsulaTo
    Indicates a relationship where a geographic feature or structure links a peninsula to another landmass or area.
  • C. hasCityOnShore
    Indicates that a city is located on or directly adjacent to the shore of a body of water.
  • D. hasMaritimeConnection
    Indicates a relationship in which an entity is linked to seas, oceans, or maritime activities, such as shipping, navigation, or coastal operations.
  • E. isCoastalSettlementOf
    Indicates that a settlement is located on or near the coast within the territory of a specified geographic or administrative area.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83a1eed081908b2e9580f2ebeea7 completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdd04609748190987a9364a387fa61 completed April 2, 2026, 2:11 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4b97870481908f7a89df10d58a9e completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd4f8d9b888190b8067bd916dae773 completed April 1, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9 p.m.