Triple

T10081555
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jeanne Langevin E213911 entity
Predicate spouse P13 FINISHED
Object Paul Langevin E35812 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Paul Langevin | Statement: [Jeanne Langevin, spouse, Paul Langevin]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Paul Langevin
Context triple: [Jeanne Langevin, spouse, Paul Langevin]
  • A. Paul Langevin chosen
    Paul Langevin was a French physicist known for his pioneering work in statistical mechanics, magnetism, and the development of theories describing Brownian motion.
  • B. Jean-Louis Perrin
    Jean-Louis Perrin is an individual notable enough to be recognized as a distinguished bearer of the surname Perrin.
  • C. Charles-François de Broglie
    Charles-François de Broglie was an 18th-century French aristocrat, soldier, and diplomat who played a key role in secret diplomacy under King Louis XV.
  • D. Jean-Jacques Perrin
    Jean-Jacques Perrin is a French individual notable enough to be recognized as a prominent bearer of the surname Perrin.
  • E. Jean-Charles Perrin
    Jean-Charles Perrin is a person notable enough to be recognized as a bearer of the surname Perrin, though specific widely known biographical details are not clearly established.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca839bf730819086900c323c9b8c95 completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdd03482d481908b03d35dc2d16395 completed April 2, 2026, 2:11 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d2b660987c8190a6a29d9e56acbff7 completed April 5, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9 p.m.