Triple
T10078153
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Monnow Bridge |
E213825
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasGateways |
P4365
|
FINISHED |
| Object | two arched openings through the gatehouse |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: two arched openings through the gatehouse | Statement: [Monnow Bridge, hasGateways, two arched openings through the gatehouse]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGateways Context triple: [Monnow Bridge, hasGateways, two arched openings through the gatehouse]
-
A.
hasFaregates
Indicates that an entity is equipped with or contains faregates used to control or validate access, typically for paid entry.
-
B.
hasGatesFor
Indicates that one entity is equipped with or provides access through one or more gates intended for another entity.
-
C.
hasGate
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses, includes, or is equipped with a gate as part of its structure or configuration.
-
D.
hasGatekeeper
Indicates that one entity serves as a controlling or mediating gatekeeper for access to another entity.
-
E.
hasGateRange
Indicates the range of values or interval within which a gate or gating parameter is valid or operates.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca839bf730819086900c323c9b8c95 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdd030a0fc819084b523e8e63636fa |
completed | April 2, 2026, 2:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd4b97870481908f7a89df10d58a9e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9 p.m.