Triple

T10078079
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cayo Yayi (Vieques) E213823 entity
Predicate hasPrimaryLanguageNearby P91957 FINISHED
Object Spanish LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Spanish | Statement: [Cayo Yayi (Vieques), hasPrimaryLanguageNearby, Spanish]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPrimaryLanguageNearby
Context triple: [Cayo Yayi (Vieques), hasPrimaryLanguageNearby, Spanish]
  • A. hasPrimaryLanguage1
    Indicates that an entity’s main or most commonly used language is the specified language.
  • B. hasLanguageOfSurroundingCountries
    Indicates that an entity uses or includes the languages commonly spoken in the countries that geographically surround it.
  • C. hasNeighboringLanguages
    Indicates that two languages are geographically or regionally adjacent to each other in their areas of use.
  • D. isLinguaFrancaOf
    Indicates that a language serves as a common medium of communication between speakers of different native languages within a particular region, community, or context.
  • E. eligibleLanguage
    Indicates that a particular language satisfies the required conditions to be considered valid or allowed in a given context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca839bf730819086900c323c9b8c95 completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdd030a0fc819084b523e8e63636fa completed April 2, 2026, 2:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4b97870481908f7a89df10d58a9e completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd4f8d9b888190b8067bd916dae773 completed April 1, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9 p.m.