Triple
T10062851
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rockford IceHogs |
E213028
|
entity |
| Predicate | stateLeagueLevel |
P91899
|
FINISHED |
| Object | top minor league level below NHL |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: top minor league level below NHL | Statement: [Rockford IceHogs, stateLeagueLevel, top minor league level below NHL]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stateLeagueLevel Context triple: [Rockford IceHogs, stateLeagueLevel, top minor league level below NHL]
-
A.
stateLeague
Indicates that a sports team or club competes in, or is affiliated with, a particular state-level league or competition.
-
B.
associatedLeagueLevel
Indicates that one entity is linked to another entity representing the competitive tier or level of a sports league.
-
C.
leagueType
Indicates the classification or category of a league within a broader organizational or competitive structure.
-
D.
eligibleLeague
Indicates that an entity (such as a team or player) is qualified or permitted to participate in a particular league.
-
E.
developmentLeagueFor
Indicates that one entity serves as a developmental or minor league affiliate for another, typically higher-level, sports team or organization.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83977128819084084eb7d1d8c52a |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdcfd4e4ac8190a37061b4082caa48 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 2:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd4b92573481909389bc6148ae7ea8 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cd4f8d9b888190b8067bd916dae773 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:58 p.m.