Triple

T100601
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Feynman–Kac formula E2031 entity
Predicate centralIn P4751 FINISHED
Object probabilistic potential theory LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: probabilistic potential theory | Statement: [Feynman–Kac formula, centralIn, probabilistic potential theory]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: centralIn
Context triple: [Feynman–Kac formula, centralIn, probabilistic potential theory]
  • A. centralText
    Indicates that one text element is positioned or designated as the central or primary text relative to surrounding content or layout.
  • B. primaryHubFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as the main central hub or core point of coordination for another entity or set of entities.
  • C. isMajorCenterOf
    Indicates that a place serves as a primary hub or focal point for a particular activity, function, or domain.
  • D. centralBank
    Indicates that an entity functions as the primary monetary authority responsible for issuing currency and implementing monetary policy for a specific jurisdiction.
  • E. hasCentralFigure
    Indicates that something features a primary or most important figure at its core or focus.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24d4862f881908cc8b89d3a78031d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:04 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a253b95d4c81909d1f2bc37e799c44 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24ebfc5a88190bdd1653b9fa541fe completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:11 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a253b869448190bd75a3542806b36c completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:32 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:09 a.m.