Triple

T1005819
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Eastmancolor E21707 entity
Predicate knownIssue P21734 FINISHED
Object dye fading in early stocks LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dye fading in early stocks | Statement: [Eastmancolor, knownIssue, dye fading in early stocks]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: knownIssue
Context triple: [Eastmancolor, knownIssue, dye fading in early stocks]
  • A. raisesIssue
    Indicates that one entity brings up, reports, or formally submits a concern, problem, or topic for attention to another entity or system.
  • B. issueType
    Indicates the specific category or classification assigned to an issue within a tracking or management context.
  • C. underlyingIssue
    Indicates that one situation, problem, or condition is the fundamental cause or root problem behind another.
  • D. issues
    Indicates that an entity formally produces, releases, or distributes something, such as a document, order, or resource, making it officially available.
  • E. facingIssue
    Indicates that an entity is currently experiencing, encountering, or dealing with a problem, difficulty, or obstacle.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493c53e648190ae8cb76c433fd9a7 completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b51303548190a5ee3c0797fc3245 completed March 1, 2026, 9:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b2b2e7108190b338b6c19d4aff55 completed March 1, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4b326d9d88190913c1a892a795707 completed March 1, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:41 p.m.