Triple

T10055502
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hilbert’s fourteenth problem E208850 entity
Predicate counterexampleInvolves P64864 FINISHED
Object non-finitely generated ring of invariants LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: non-finitely generated ring of invariants | Statement: [Hilbert’s fourteenth problem, counterexampleInvolves, non-finitely generated ring of invariants]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: counterexampleInvolves
Context triple: [Hilbert’s fourteenth problem, counterexampleInvolves, non-finitely generated ring of invariants]
  • A. hasCounterexample chosen
    Indicates that there exists at least one specific case or instance that disproves or violates a given claim, rule, or general statement.
  • B. nonExample
    Indicates that something is explicitly identified as not being an example or instance of a given concept, category, or pattern.
  • C. hasNonExample
    Indicates that something is associated with an instance that explicitly does not satisfy or illustrate a given concept, rule, or category.
  • D. containsCounterpoint
    Indicates that one element includes or incorporates another element that serves as a contrasting or opposing argument, idea, or perspective.
  • E. contradictedTheory
    Indicates that one entity has presented evidence, arguments, or findings that oppose, challenge, or invalidate the theory proposed by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca836094408190a36a1ea7e9a86fcd completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdcfacacd08190abe66f8bb17b92c7 completed April 2, 2026, 2:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4b8d2280819089de27e57babd1f3 completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:57 p.m.