Triple

T10054647
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Green Notice E208829 entity
Predicate doesNotConstitute P91850 FINISHED
Object an international arrest warrant LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: an international arrest warrant | Statement: [Green Notice, doesNotConstitute, an international arrest warrant]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: doesNotConstitute
Context triple: [Green Notice, doesNotConstitute, an international arrest warrant]
  • A. doesNot
    Indicates that a specified entity lacks, refrains from, or fails to perform a particular action or exhibit a particular property in relation to another entity or context.
  • B. doesNotAbolish
    Indicates that one entity, action, or law does not eliminate, revoke, or put an end to another.
  • C. doesNotStandFor
    Indicates that one entity does not represent, symbolize, or act on behalf of another entity in any capacity.
  • D. doesNotConsider
    Indicates that one entity fails or chooses not to take another entity or factor into account when forming judgments, decisions, or actions.
  • E. doesNotNecessarily
    Indicates that the specified condition, relationship, or outcome is not guaranteed to hold, even if other related conditions are true.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca836094408190a36a1ea7e9a86fcd completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdcfab39408190ac728fe156eed658 completed April 2, 2026, 2:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4b8d2280819089de27e57babd1f3 completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd4f8d9b888190b8067bd916dae773 completed April 1, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:57 p.m.