Triple
T10053453
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Common Agricultural Policy |
E208804
|
entity |
| Predicate | 2013ReformFeature |
P24524
|
FINISHED |
| Object | greening payments |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: greening payments | Statement: [Common Agricultural Policy, 2013ReformFeature, greening payments]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: 2013ReformFeature Context triple: [Common Agricultural Policy, 2013ReformFeature, greening payments]
-
A.
implementedReformsIn
Indicates that an entity (typically a person, organization, or government) carried out or put into effect specific reforms within a particular context, domain, or location.
-
B.
reformsBy
Indicates that one entity initiates, implements, or is responsible for changes or improvements (reforms) affecting another entity.
-
C.
isPartOfReform
chosen
Indicates that an action, measure, or component belongs to, contributes to, or is included within a broader reform initiative or process.
-
D.
reform
Indicates bringing about significant changes to an existing system, practice, or entity in order to improve or correct it.
-
E.
subjectToReformBy
Indicates that an entity is undergoing or designated for changes, improvements, or restructuring carried out by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca836094408190a36a1ea7e9a86fcd |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdcf9241208190b38e5e7a1604589c |
completed | April 2, 2026, 2:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd4b8d2280819089de27e57babd1f3 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:57 p.m.