Triple

T10050102
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject DATA command E207722 entity
Predicate hasHistoricalStandard P47327 FINISHED
Object RFC 821 E35264 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 821 | Statement: [DATA command, hasHistoricalStandard, RFC 821]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 821
Context triple: [DATA command, hasHistoricalStandard, RFC 821]
  • A. RFC 821 chosen
    RFC 821 is the original Internet standard that formally defined the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) for electronic mail transmission.
  • B. RFC 2821
    RFC 2821 is an earlier Internet standard that defined the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) for email transmission before being superseded by RFC 5321.
  • C. RFC 822
    RFC 822 is an early Internet standard that defines the format of text-based email messages, including headers and addressing conventions.
  • D. RFC 5321
    RFC 5321 is the Internet standard that specifies the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) used for email transmission across IP networks.
  • E. RFC 882
    RFC 882 was an early Internet standard that originally specified the Domain Name System (DNS) protocol before being superseded by later RFCs such as RFC 1035.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHistoricalStandard
Context triple: [DATA command, hasHistoricalStandard, RFC 821]
  • A. hasHistoricalData
    Indicates that an entity possesses recorded information or records about past events, states, or values relevant to it.
  • B. historicalSignalStandard chosen
    Indicates that something conforms to or is associated with a signal standard that is no longer current and is of historical relevance.
  • C. hasHistoricalEntity
    Indicates a relationship where one entity includes, references, or is associated with another entity that existed or is defined in a past historical context.
  • D. historicalStatusOf
    Indicates the historical condition, role, or classification that an entity held during a specific past period or context.
  • E. hasHistoricalCategory
    Indicates that something is associated with a particular historical classification, period, or type based on its past context or significance.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca835ad0608190b7c80b292da004f5 completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdcf8e41c4819091fa12742197e207 completed April 2, 2026, 2:08 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d2b61869208190ab67a28e2aa8f8ec completed April 5, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4b8d2280819089de27e57babd1f3 completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:56 p.m.