Triple
T10050071
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | DATA command |
E207722
|
entity |
| Predicate | definedIn |
P775
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 5321 |
E34940
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 5321 | Statement: [DATA command, definedIn, RFC 5321]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 5321 Context triple: [DATA command, definedIn, RFC 5321]
-
A.
RFC 5321
chosen
RFC 5321 is the Internet standard that specifies the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) used for email transmission across IP networks.
-
B.
RFC 2821
RFC 2821 is an earlier Internet standard that defined the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) for email transmission before being superseded by RFC 5321.
-
C.
RFC 3821
RFC 3821 is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) standards document that specifies the Internet Fibre Channel Protocol (iFCP) for transporting Fibre Channel frames over IP networks.
-
D.
RFC 3821
RFC 3821 is an IETF standards document that specifies the Fibre Channel over TCP/IP (FCIP) protocol for transporting Fibre Channel frames over IP networks.
-
E.
RFC 821
RFC 821 is the original Internet standard that formally defined the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) for electronic mail transmission.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca835ad0608190b7c80b292da004f5 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdcf8e41c4819091fa12742197e207 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 2:08 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d2829674f08190b5f9c3b984106469 |
completed | April 5, 2026, 3:41 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:56 p.m.