Triple
T10035898
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hewitt (hill) |
E204967
|
entity |
| Predicate | unitOfProminence |
P92043
|
FINISHED |
| Object | meters |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: meters | Statement: [Hewitt (hill), unitOfProminence, meters]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: unitOfProminence Context triple: [Hewitt (hill), unitOfProminence, meters]
-
A.
hasProminence
Indicates that one entity stands out in importance, visibility, or influence relative to others within a given context.
-
B.
gainedProminenceFor
Indicates that an entity became widely recognized or notable specifically because of another entity, action, or achievement.
-
C.
isMostProminentIn
Indicates that an entity stands out as the most notable, influential, or dominant among comparable entities within a specified context or domain.
-
D.
rankByProminence
Indicates that entities are ordered or assigned a position based on their level of prominence or notability relative to one another.
-
E.
prominence
Indicates that an entity stands out in importance, visibility, or influence relative to others within a given context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca834d77188190ad645e33e8ca3200 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdce4bb3408190ac5dae4718ef7cad |
completed | April 2, 2026, 2:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd4b8638508190b22acc65500ec7d6 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cd4fed19d481909d2c7ff1114664b6 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:03 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:55 p.m.