Triple

T1003574
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject William H. Rehnquist E21657 entity
Predicate swornInAsAssociateJusticeOn P22199 FINISHED
Object 1972-01-07 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1972-01-07 | Statement: [William H. Rehnquist, swornInAsAssociateJusticeOn, 1972-01-07]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: swornInAsAssociateJusticeOn
Context triple: [William H. Rehnquist, swornInAsAssociateJusticeOn, 1972-01-07]
  • A. chiefJustice
    Indicates that one entity serves as the chief justice (the highest-ranking judicial officer) of another entity, such as a court or jurisdiction.
  • B. appointedAfter
    Indicates that one entity was appointed to a position or role at a later time than another entity.
  • C. chiefJusticeSinceYear
    Indicates that an entity has held the position of chief justice starting from a specified year.
  • D. appointedFrom
    Indicates that an entity was selected or assigned to a position or role originating from a specified source, body, or prior position.
  • E. numberOfAssociateJustices
    Indicates the total count of associate justices associated with a given judicial body or court.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493c53e648190ae8cb76c433fd9a7 completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b4fe0a548190aee8abf1890e141e completed March 1, 2026, 9:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b2b1f4f88190822598cfd2a0fd2b completed March 1, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4b36064a48190b85c402f32cbadd1 completed March 1, 2026, 9:45 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:41 p.m.