Triple
T10024660
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IETF DNSOP |
E200694
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasWebPage |
P21673
|
FINISHED |
| Object | https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop | Statement: [IETF DNSOP, hasWebPage, https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasWebPage Context triple: [IETF DNSOP, hasWebPage, https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop]
-
A.
webPage
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a web page associated with, describing, or providing information about another entity.
-
B.
hasFamousPage
Indicates that an entity is associated with a well-known or widely recognized page, such as on a website or platform.
-
C.
hasPage
Indicates that one entity includes, is associated with, or is documented by a specific page (such as a web page or document page).
-
D.
hasCompanionWebsite
Indicates that something is associated with or supported by a dedicated companion website.
-
E.
hasPublisherWebsite
Indicates that an entity is associated with the official website of its publisher.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca831c45f08190ac1505cc15076608 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdcd7d9c9c81909a0a0917deed0973 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 1:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd4b7cd4208190b2253583ee2f892c |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:53 p.m.