Triple
T1002100
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wallonia |
E21626
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAutonomyIn |
P21306
|
FINISHED |
| Object | economic policy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: economic policy | Statement: [Wallonia, hasAutonomyIn, economic policy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAutonomyIn Context triple: [Wallonia, hasAutonomyIn, economic policy]
-
A.
hasAutonomyWithin
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses independent decision-making power or self-governance within the scope, domain, or boundaries defined by another entity.
-
B.
autonomyStatus
Indicates the degree to which an entity operates independently or with self-governed control, without external direction or intervention.
-
C.
grantsOfAutonomy
Indicates that one entity confers a degree of self-governance, independence, or decision-making authority to another entity.
-
D.
usesAuthorityOf
Indicates that one entity exercises power, rights, or influence derived from or on behalf of another entity’s authority.
-
E.
hasAuthorityControl
Indicates that one entity possesses formal power, control, or decision-making authority over another entity or activity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493c53e648190ae8cb76c433fd9a7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b4fcbc04819098d2125518f62ae7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b2b1f4f88190822598cfd2a0fd2b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:41 p.m.