Triple
T10020078
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Java Persistence API |
E200590
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | persistence framework specification |
C23037
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: persistence framework specification Context triple: [Java Persistence API, instanceOf, persistence framework specification]
-
A.
Object-relational mapping framework
An object-relational mapping framework is a software layer that automatically maps objects in application code to records in a relational database, allowing developers to interact with data using object-oriented paradigms instead of SQL.
-
B.
Object–relational mapping tool
An object–relational mapping tool is a software library or framework that automatically maps objects in application code to rows in a relational database, allowing developers to work with data using object-oriented paradigms instead of SQL.
-
C.
specification
chosen
A specification is a detailed, precise description of requirements, behaviors, and constraints that a system, component, or process must satisfy.
-
D.
object-oriented framework
An object-oriented framework is a reusable, extensible software structure that defines cooperating classes and interfaces to provide a common architecture for building applications in a specific domain.
-
E.
work-in-progress specification
A work-in-progress specification is a partially developed, evolving document that defines requirements, designs, or standards that are still under active review and subject to change.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca831c45f08190ac1505cc15076608 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:53 p.m.