Triple
T10015076
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Minot, Maine |
E199465
|
entity |
| Predicate | adjacentTo |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Turner, Maine |
E194209
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Turner, Maine | Statement: [Minot, Maine, adjacentTo, Turner, Maine]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Turner, Maine Context triple: [Minot, Maine, adjacentTo, Turner, Maine]
-
A.
Turner, Maine
chosen
Turner, Maine is a small rural town in the western part of the state known for its agricultural character and scenic setting along the Androscoggin River.
-
B.
Thorndike, Maine
Thorndike, Maine is a small rural town located in Waldo County in the central part of the state.
-
C.
Waterford, Maine
Waterford, Maine is a small rural town in Oxford County known for its lakes, forests, and traditional New England village character.
-
D.
Winslow, Maine
Winslow, Maine is a small town in Kennebec County known for its rural character, historic sites, and location along the Kennebec River in central Maine.
-
E.
Porter, Maine
Porter, Maine is a small rural town in Oxford County known for its scenic setting near the New Hampshire border and its traditional New England character.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8315a1a08190ab310f25620f362b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdcd49b19c8190b429e3533d072648 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 1:58 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f62a6efa448190a9d95c5bd68ff34b |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:46 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:52 p.m.