Triple
T10001378
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Echinades Islands |
E197333
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNearbyCity |
P350
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mesolongi |
E119986
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mesolongi | Statement: [Echinades Islands, hasNearbyCity, Mesolongi]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mesolongi Context triple: [Echinades Islands, hasNearbyCity, Mesolongi]
-
A.
Mesolongi
chosen
Mesolongi is a historic town in western Greece, renowned for its pivotal role and sieges during the Greek War of Independence and as the place where Lord Byron died.
-
B.
Arispe
Arispe is a small unincorporated rural community located in Ringgold County, Iowa.
-
C.
Moura
Moura is a historic town in Portugal’s Alentejo region, known for its whitewashed architecture, olive oil production, and proximity to the Alqueva reservoir.
-
D.
Moura
Moura is a small coal-mining town in Central Queensland, Australia, known for its agricultural activities and history of mining disasters.
-
E.
Moura
Moura is a Portuguese-language surname commonly found in Brazil and other Lusophone countries, associated with various notable figures in arts, sports, and public life.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82f3b61c81908ecc2c1c96dbc2e4 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdcc8f50888190b2f1c5240cb58e4f |
completed | April 2, 2026, 1:55 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d25854c524819081315b1a8faf335e |
completed | April 5, 2026, 12:40 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:51 p.m.