Triple
T10000360
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CIA Annex Security Team |
E197309
|
entity |
| Predicate | operationalTask |
P91216
|
FINISHED |
| Object | compound defense |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: compound defense | Statement: [CIA Annex Security Team, operationalTask, compound defense]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: operationalTask Context triple: [CIA Annex Security Team, operationalTask, compound defense]
-
A.
operationalChallenge
Indicates that an entity faces difficulties, obstacles, or inefficiencies in carrying out its regular operations or processes.
-
B.
operationOf
Indicates that one entity is the function, activity, or process carried out by another entity (such as a system, device, or organization).
-
C.
operationalCommand
Indicates that one entity issues or holds authoritative control over the actions or operations of another entity.
-
D.
operation
Indicates that one entity performs, carries out, or controls the functioning of another entity or system.
-
E.
userTask
Indicates that a specific task is assigned to, owned by, or performed by a particular user.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82f3b61c81908ecc2c1c96dbc2e4 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdcc8dc9c081909b6d20909ada09cf |
completed | April 2, 2026, 1:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd1da2cf9081908a6c0eb5247d0bc2 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:29 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cd358386f48190833c862b5b8c04b2 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 3:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:51 p.m.