canReview
P8869
predicate
Indicates that one entity has the permission or ability to evaluate, assess, or provide feedback on another entity.
All labels observed (8)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| canReview canonical | 362 |
| mayReview | 88 |
| canAudit | 14 |
| canExamine | 8 |
| hasDiscretionaryReview | 2 |
| mayBeReviewedFor | 2 |
| canReviewDirectly | 1 |
| contractReviewFunction | 1 |
Description generation (PDg)
The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.
Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning. # Instructions Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. # Response Format Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: canReview
Generated description
Indicates that one entity has the permission or ability to evaluate, assess, or provide feedback on another entity.
Sample triples (478)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| judicial branch of Pakistan | legislation passed by the Parliament of Pakistan ⓘ |
| Supreme Court of Zambia | decisions of the High Court of Zambia ⓘ |
| Supreme Court of Zambia | decisions of other superior courts as provided by law ⓘ |
| Supreme Court of Haiti | constitutional issues under Haitian law ⓘ |
| Minnesota Supreme Court | most appeals from Minnesota Court of Appeals via predicate surface "hasDiscretionaryReview" ⓘ |
| Supreme Court of Ohio | decisions of Ohio Courts of Appeals ⓘ |
| Supreme Court of Ohio | death penalty cases from Ohio trial courts ⓘ |
| California courts | administrative agency decisions under California law via predicate surface "mayReview" ⓘ |
| District of Columbia Court of Appeals | decisions of the D.C. Superior Court en banc ⓘ |
| Texas Courts of Appeals | final judgments of trial courts ⓘ |
| Texas Courts of Appeals | certain interlocutory orders ⓘ |
| Tribunal fédéral | acts of federal authorities for constitutionality within Swiss system limits ⓘ |
| North Carolina Supreme Court | decisions of the North Carolina Court of Appeals ⓘ |
| North Carolina Supreme Court | direct appeals in certain cases from trial courts ⓘ |
| Judiciary of South Africa | acts of Parliament ⓘ |
| Judiciary of South Africa | conduct of the executive ⓘ |
| Oregon appellate courts | criminal cases via predicate surface "mayReview" ⓘ |
| Oregon appellate courts | civil cases via predicate surface "mayReview" ⓘ |
| Oregon appellate courts | administrative agency decisions via predicate surface "mayReview" ⓘ |
| National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians | Canadian Security Intelligence Service ⓘ |
| National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians |
Canada Communications Security Establishment
ⓘ
surface form:
Communications Security Establishment
|
| National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians | Royal Canadian Mounted Police national security activities ⓘ |
| National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians | Canada Border Services Agency national security activities ⓘ |
| National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians | Department of National Defence national security activities ⓘ |
| National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians | Global Affairs Canada security and intelligence activities ⓘ |
| National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians | other federal departments with national security responsibilities ⓘ |
| Ad hoc committees (India) | legislative proposals via predicate surface "canExamine" ⓘ |
| Ad hoc committees (India) | policy matters via predicate surface "canExamine" ⓘ |
| Ad hoc committees (India) | administrative issues via predicate surface "canExamine" ⓘ |
| Estimates Committee (India) | ministries and departments of Government of India via predicate surface "canExamine" ⓘ |
| Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation | treaties of the Russian Federation ⓘ |
| Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation | disputes on competence between federal bodies ⓘ |
| Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation | disputes on competence between federal and regional authorities ⓘ |
| Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation | disputes on competence between highest state bodies of subjects of the Russian Federation ⓘ |
| Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation | complaints on violation of constitutional rights and freedoms by law applied in a specific case ⓘ |
| Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation | requests from courts on constitutionality of laws to be applied ⓘ |
| Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation | impeachment procedures of the President of Russia ⓘ |
| Courts of Appeal of Chile | questions of law ⓘ |
| Courts of Appeal of Chile | questions of fact in certain cases ⓘ |
| Administrative Court of Zimbabwe | decisions of government ministries ⓘ |
| Administrative Court of Zimbabwe | decisions of regulatory agencies ⓘ |
| Administrative Court of Zimbabwe | decisions of administrative tribunals ⓘ |
| Washington Court of Appeals | certain decisions of state administrative boards via predicate surface "mayReview" ⓘ |
|
Civil Division
surface form:
Civil Division of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
|
findings of fact in limited circumstances via predicate surface "mayReview" ⓘ |
| Texas courts | actions of Texas executive agencies ⓘ |
| Texas courts | local government actions in Texas ⓘ |
| Judicial Branch of Panama | constitutionality of laws in Panama ⓘ |
|
administrative courts
surface form:
administrative courts in Italy
|
discretionary administrative decisions within legality limits ⓘ |
| Supreme Court of the Federated States of Micronesia | acts of the national government of the Federated States of Micronesia ⓘ |
| Supreme Court of the Federated States of Micronesia | acts of state governments of the Federated States of Micronesia ⓘ |