Caroline test

E872432

Caroline test is a key principle in international law that sets strict conditions under which a state may lawfully claim self-defense, particularly in anticipatory or preemptive contexts.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (34)

Predicate Object
instanceOf customary international law rule
principle of international law
aimsTo limit unilateral use of force by states
prevent abusive claims of self-defense
appliesTo anticipatory self-defense
preemptive self-defense
self-defense in international law
characterizedBy strict necessity requirement
strict proportionality requirement
consideredAs stringent standard for lawful self-defense
consideredBy international courts and tribunals in self-defense cases
formsPartOf customary international law on use of force
guides evaluation of cross-border self-defense operations
evaluation of preemptive military strikes
hasAlternativeName Caroline doctrine NERFINISHED
hasKeyElement immediacy
lack of reasonable alternatives
necessity
proportionality
influences interpretation of Article 51 of the UN Charter
invokedIn academic debates on legality of preemptive war
legal justifications for anticipatory self-defense by states
legalBasisFor lawful use of force in anticipatory self-defense
relatedTo customary rules on use of force
doctrine of anticipatory self-defense
jus ad bellum
setsCondition necessity of self-defense must be instant, overwhelming
necessity of self-defense must leave no choice of means
necessity of self-defense must leave no moment for deliberation
self-defense must be proportionate
use of force must be limited to what is necessary for self-defense
usedIn assessment of legality of cross-border military actions
international legal scholarship on use of force
state practice on self-defense

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Caroline affair legalDoctrine Caroline test