Dublin system
E858297
The Dublin system is a European Union framework that determines which member state is responsible for examining an asylum application lodged within the EU.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Dublin system canonical | 2 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T10341682 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Dublin system Context triple: [Dublin Regulation, alsoKnownAs, Dublin system]
-
A.
Dowdall system
The Dowdall system is a preferential voting method in which voters rank candidates and each ranking is weighted by the reciprocal of its position, favoring broadly acceptable candidates over merely first-choice favorites.
-
B.
Engler system
The Engler system is a historical botanical classification framework developed by Adolf Engler that organized plants primarily by morphological characteristics and was widely used before modern phylogenetic systems.
-
C.
Takhtajan system
The Takhtajan system is an influential 20th-century classification of flowering plants developed by Armenian-Russian botanist Armen Takhtajan, notable for its detailed phylogenetic approach and extensive use in botanical taxonomy before being superseded by molecular-based systems.
-
D.
Thorne system
The Thorne system is a classification framework in botany used to organize flowering plants based on their evolutionary relationships.
-
E.
Auburn system
The Auburn system is a 19th-century prison model characterized by strict discipline, congregate labor by day in enforced silence, and solitary confinement by night.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Dublin system Target entity description: The Dublin system is a European Union framework that determines which member state is responsible for examining an asylum application lodged within the EU.
-
A.
Dowdall system
The Dowdall system is a preferential voting method in which voters rank candidates and each ranking is weighted by the reciprocal of its position, favoring broadly acceptable candidates over merely first-choice favorites.
-
B.
Engler system
The Engler system is a historical botanical classification framework developed by Adolf Engler that organized plants primarily by morphological characteristics and was widely used before modern phylogenetic systems.
-
C.
Takhtajan system
The Takhtajan system is an influential 20th-century classification of flowering plants developed by Armenian-Russian botanist Armen Takhtajan, notable for its detailed phylogenetic approach and extensive use in botanical taxonomy before being superseded by molecular-based systems.
-
D.
Thorne system
The Thorne system is a classification framework in botany used to organize flowering plants based on their evolutionary relationships.
-
E.
Auburn system
The Auburn system is a 19th-century prison model characterized by strict discipline, congregate labor by day in enforced silence, and solitary confinement by night.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
European Union asylum framework
ⓘ
asylum responsibility allocation mechanism ⓘ |
| aimsTo |
avoid asylum shopping
ⓘ
clarify responsibility among member states ⓘ ensure quick access to asylum procedures ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs | Dublin Regulation system NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
European Union member states
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Schengen-associated states NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| basedOn | principle that only one member state is responsible for an asylum claim ⓘ |
| coordinatedWith | Eurodac system NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| covers |
asylum applications lodged at the border of EU member states
ⓘ
asylum applications lodged in the territory of EU member states ⓘ asylum applications lodged in the transit zones of EU member states ⓘ |
| criticizedBy |
European Parliament members
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
UNHCR NERFINISHED ⓘ human rights organizations ⓘ |
| criticizedFor |
inefficiency and delays in transfers
ⓘ
insufficient protection of asylum seekers' rights ⓘ placing disproportionate burden on border states ⓘ |
| defines | criteria for determining the responsible member state ⓘ |
| geographicalScope |
European Union
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Iceland NERFINISHED ⓘ Liechtenstein NERFINISHED ⓘ Norway NERFINISHED ⓘ Switzerland NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasEffect |
assigns responsibility for asylum seekers to specific states
ⓘ
prevents multiple asylum applications in different EU states ⓘ |
| hasLegalBasis |
Dublin Convention
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Dublin II Regulation NERFINISHED ⓘ Dublin III Regulation NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasPurpose | determine which state is responsible for examining an asylum application ⓘ |
| implementedBy | Dublin III Regulation NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| partOf | Common European Asylum System NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| reformDiscussedBy |
Council of the European Union
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
European Commission NERFINISHED ⓘ European Parliament NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| regulates |
allocation of responsibility for asylum claims
ⓘ
asylum procedures coordination between EU states ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
EU asylum procedures directive
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
EU qualification directive NERFINISHED ⓘ EU reception conditions directive NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| replaced | Dublin Convention NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| subjectTo |
Court of Justice of the European Union interpretation
ⓘ
European Court of Human Rights case law impacts ⓘ |
| uses | fingerprint data for determining first country of entry ⓘ |
| usesCriterion |
application in international transit areas
ⓘ
family unity considerations ⓘ first EU country of entry ⓘ irregular border crossing ⓘ issuance of residence permits or visas ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Dublin system Description of subject: The Dublin system is a European Union framework that determines which member state is responsible for examining an asylum application lodged within the EU.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.